Thursday, December 31, 2009
Demographic threat or Not?!
American aliya doomed to fail
Tampering with the Supreme Court
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Israeli Oligarchy- What next?
Israel's population at the end of 2010
More Solar Power Plants on the way
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Fortifying our dairy with vitamin D
Monday, December 28, 2009
NIS 4 billion more tax revenue for 2009
Israel Electric Company Watch
Jihadist persecution of Christians in muslim countries
Sunday, December 27, 2009
Answer to Tony Judt
Saturday, December 26, 2009
Income inequality in Israel- a conversation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adva_Center & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mizrahi_Democratic_Rainbow_Coalition
One must be critical of proposed statistics from organizations with a such a clear anti-capitalist and ethno-centric agenda: Adva is a well known organization that seeks to advocate the rights of the so-called "Mizrachim."
As for Israel, it does in fact support the weaker segments of society through healthcare/social security and food subsidies, etc, but also with special programs for new immigrants and those that live in the periphery, not to mention welfare payments to able bodied people who refuse to work because of supposed religious reasons (Arab women and Haredim).
What Adva supports is a socialist style of redistribution of wealth, ie from our pockets into the pockets of people who didn't and don't want to go to University, nor do they necessarily seek a better job for themselves or improve their situation. These people prefer to be pizza delivery boys or house wives. They rather complain about the rich and professional classes making more money and hoping that they will get more government hand outs taken from those who studied hard and worked hard to get to where they are today!
The government does play and should continue to play a role in encouraging economic growth and facilitating an improvement in education and infrastructure in order to increase socio-economic mobility. But outright redistribution of wealth is catastrophic and should only be done in order to support the ill, elderly, or disabled in our society (not because they are darker skinned or born in Asia/Africa!).
http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3825148,00.html
Adva's report: http://www.adva.org/default.asp?pageid=1002&itmid=574
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
SHAS on the attack- again!
Monday, December 21, 2009
Women Praying at the Western Wall
Israel's Immigration Police
"Reformists" in the Middle East
Four years after his father was blown up by thugs associated with the Alawites, Saad Hariri decides to visit Bashar Assad and committs Lebanon to the usual economic cooperation, and of course, a few lines about the plight of the Palestinians and Israel's role as menace to the region. Next to Bashar, Hariri made clear his belief that "Israel violates the rights of Arabs." That he stands next to the man who has run around the UN request for investigating the death of his father looks insane to me. But Israel unites all. And Hariri is the reformer.
What is most disturbing to me is watching the March 14 coalition evolve, the scion of Saad Hariri and the Lebanese democrats that brought hundreds of thousands to downtown Beirut and, in no small part, led to Syria's withdrawal. I have not done enough research on March 14 to reasonably comment on the evolution of their goals, however, let it be said that these movements should not be mistaken for movements that will, b/c they are composed of men wearing deisel jeans and silk screen t-shirts, be good for Israel.
There is this false assumption which assumes that becasue the movement looks pretty, becasue its adherents look like people you'd see in Queens, then they are probably sans danger. I see a similiar thing happeneing in Iran. So much of the commentary (maybe even my own) is so naive, and very very superficial. Do we really know where these movements stand when it comes to Israel? Mousavi in Iran: do we expect this guy to offer the olive branch? Same things goes for the democrats in Egypt. In short, lets just do a little more research before we think these guys are the answer.
This is why the Hariri visit was so disheartening and leads me to be even more skeptical of these reformers we hail as answers to the region.
Israel pushes back against Brit
I've been ranting about this for years. Simple principle: the peace process is a commodity. Threaten to lock parties out of it, they'll get in line. Now, the British gov does something about the ridiculous legal loophole of "Universal Jurisdiction". . . Because Netanyahu threatened to remove them from the "peace process" (should be done anyway...along with their diplomatic mission).
More must-reads:
Why never a Royal Visit? Link.
Britain and Universal Governance. Link.
Obama's Media Watchdog
Check it out at Yid With Lid
http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2009/12/obama-unleashes-media-matters-to-attack.html
Haredim against bike lanes in Brooklyn
hamas masterminded British arrest warrants
North Korean arms for Iran/Hizbollah
Sunday, December 20, 2009
Syria and Lebanon mending ties
So now Haaretz is encouraging E. Jerusalem Development...
Of course, when it means another chance to take a dig at Israel. Their consistency, at least, is admirable.
Palestinian elections- to be or not to be?
Israelis face arrest in England - not a double standard, eh?
Palestinians fire at Egyptians seeking to seal off their border with Gaza
Jews as their own worst enemies
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Gov supported newspapers?!
Hizbollah in the Lebanon
Indonesia-Israel
NyTimes & Saudi Insanity
This is truly a revolting piece: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/
The Saudis are insane… After being FM for since the 1970s, perhaps he should have considered some out of the box thinking, like actually recognizing Israel's right to exist and, like Jordan and Egypt, establish ties with Israel- at least at some form or public level! Or how about allowing Palys to be allowed to settle in the vat expanse of Saudi Arabia. Rather than inport a million foreign workers from Africa and India, why not allow the Palys to live there, where unlike in here, they would have no choice but to adhere to the Saud'si wahabi lifestyle..?
What pisses me off is the whole tone of the article, making him seem like some sort of Gandhi! Unvelievable